Coupled JR 3-column — noise σ=0.1 (extreme (exploratory))

PARITYS1 · dim 18

No clear winner. The survival gap is under 10 percentage points and the balanced-score gap is under 0.05, so neither SolvSRK nor the best baseline clears the win threshold. Either works — choose on cost, licensing, or integration effort. All verdicts →

18D coupled Jansen-Rit 3-column network with additive noise σ=0.1. Noise regime: extreme (exploratory). Base problem: NMM.5. Runner injects noise via acceptance_criteria.noise_sigma.

Neuroscience

Problem definition

Jansen & Rit (1995); González Mitjans et al. (2023)

Canonical RHS excerpt from the registered callable used for this benchmark cell. Expand it to verify the state equations; it is not a standalone runnable fixture.

Show canonical RHS excerpt
def _stable_expit(x):
    """Numerically stable sigmoid 1/(1+exp(-x)), scalar or array."""
    x = np.asarray(x, dtype=float)
    return np.where(
        x >= 0,
        1.0 / (1.0 + np.exp(-x)),
        np.exp(x) / (1.0 + np.exp(x)),
    )

def _jr_sigmoid(v, v_max=5.0, r=0.56, v0=6.0):
    """Jansen-Rit population sigmoid: S(v) = v_max / (1 + exp(r*(v0 - v)))."""
    return v_max * _stable_expit(r * (v - v0))

def rhs(t: float, y: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
    dy = np.empty(18)

    col_outputs = np.empty(n_cols)
    for j in range(n_cols):
        off = j * 6
        col_outputs[j] = _jr_sigmoid(y[off + 1] - y[off + 2])

    total_output = col_outputs.sum()

    for j in range(n_cols):
        off = j * 6
        x0, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 = y[off:off + 6]

        p_j = p_ext + w * (total_output - col_outputs[j])

        S_pyr = _jr_sigmoid(x1 - x2)
        S_exc = _jr_sigmoid(C1 * x0)
        S_inh = _jr_sigmoid(C3 * x0)

        dy[off + 0] = x3
        dy[off + 1] = x4
        dy[off + 2] = x5
        dy[off + 3] = A * a * S_pyr - 2.0 * a * x3 - a2 * x0
        dy[off + 4] = A * a * (p_j + C2 * S_exc) - 2.0 * a * x4 - a2 * x1
        dy[off + 5] = B * b * C4 * S_inh - 2.0 * b * x5 - b2 * x2

    return dy
Parameters
  • A = 3.25
  • B = 22
  • C1 = 135
  • C2 = 108
  • C3 = 33.75
  • C4 = 33.75
  • a = 100
  • a2 = 10000
  • b = 50
  • b2 = 2500
  • n_cols = 3
  • p_ext = 220
  • w = 10
  • v_max = 5
  • r = 0.56
  • v0 = 6
Initial condition
y(0) = [0.000547912097112, -0.000122243120496, 0.000717195839823, 0.000394736058119, -0.000811645304225, 0.000951244703274, …] [shape=(18,), min=-0.000872365487792, max=0.000951244703274]
Horizon
t ∈ [0, 2]

Canonical RHS excerpt captured from the same registered callable used for the published benchmark. Frozen closure values are summarized below; helper imports and solver settings are intentionally omitted.

Fingerprint

Spread: high

Default noise: medium

Recommendation snapshot

Clean best: SolvSRK

Noisy best: SolvSRK

Coverage

14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels

Ranked on survival, precision, and speed

Versions & freeze

Methodology →
Freeze
2026-08-13
libsolvsrk
2.3.0
SciPy
1.14
SUNDIALS
CVODE (bundled backend)

20 seeds/cell default · 14 arms · TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · this page: Coupled JR 3-column — noise σ=0.1 (extreme (exploratory)) (coupled-jr-3-column-noise-0-1-extreme-exploratory)

Governed SolvTune benchmark freeze; per-arm medians only. RHS definitions and raw trial rows are not published.

Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified

Results matrix

Pick an objective and a noise level to rank all arms on survival, median SCD, median nfev, and median wall time. Medians across seeds.

Objective

Best overall trade-off of survival, precision, and speed.

Noise level

#SolverSurvivalSCDnfevWallScore
1SolvSRK
100%
8.930,1871.12 s0.831
SciPy BDFSciPy
0%
SciPy RadauSciPy
0%
SciPy RK45SciPy
0%
SciPy LSODASciPy
0%
SciPy DOP853SciPy
0%
SciPy RK23SciPy
0%
CVODE BDFexternal
0%
CVODE Adamsexternal
0%
Tsit5external
0%
Vern7external
0%
Vern9external
0%
TRBDF2external
0%
FBDFexternal
0%

At Clean, best balanced arm is SolvSRK.

Values are medians across seeds, measured by Resonix Labs on Resonix hardware and not independently verified; nfev and wall are on reference lab hardware (indicative). Under injected noise only SolvSRK and the SciPy arms are run. How we measure accuracy → · Verification status →

SolvScout · free

Profile your problem for free

This page shows one published benchmark cell. SolvScout fingerprints your ODE, compares it to the full corpus, and recommends a solver with the same survival / precision / speed ranking you see here — including when a SciPy arm wins.

SolvSRK · 30-day trial

Run the winner on your machine

SolvSRK is the stiffness-adaptive integrator behind the SolvSRK column in these tables. Create an account, activate a machine, and take a 30-day trial — same binary you'd ship after purchase.

Cite this page

Replace the access date. Pin the freeze ID and library versions when comparing against a later export. Cite it as what it is — a self-reported vendor benchmark, not an independently verified result. The note field says so; please keep it.

@misc{resonix_evidence_coupled_jr_3_column_noise_0_1_extreme_exploratory_2026,
  title        = {Resonix Evidence Portal: Coupled JR 3-column — noise σ=0.1 (extreme (exploratory))},
  author       = {{Resonix Labs (Canada) Inc.}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://resonix.tech/evidence/problems/coupled-jr-3-column-noise-0-1-extreme-exploratory}},
  note         = {Self-reported vendor benchmark; internally generated by Resonix Labs and not independently verified. Accessed YYYY-MM-DD. Freeze 2026-08-13; libsolvsrk 2.3.0; SciPy 1.14.}
}

Related

TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · 398 problems · 14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels

Freeze: 2026-08-13 · scipy 1.14 · libsolvsrk 2.3.0 · Methodology

Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified · Verification status