EKF Radar Tracker — Hover

ADVANTAGES0 · dim 35

SolvSRK wins. At the comparison noise level, SolvSRK beats the best baseline by at least 10 percentage points of survival, or by at least 0.05 balanced score when survival is tied. Use SolvSRK for this class of problem. All verdicts →

Wave 1 anti-UAV kill chain. Board approved 2026-05-07.

Radar signal processing

Problem definition

Bar-Shalom (2001)

Canonical RHS excerpt from the registered callable used for this benchmark cell. Expand it to verify the state equations; it is not a standalone runnable fixture.

Show canonical RHS excerpt
def _pack_P(P: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
    """Pack 7×7 symmetric matrix into 28-element upper triangle."""
    out = np.empty(_N_COV)
    k = 0
    for i in range(_N_STATE):
        for j in range(i, _N_STATE):
            out[k] = 0.5 * (P[i, j] + P[j, i])
            k += 1
    return out

def _unpack_P(y_cov: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
    """Reconstruct 7×7 symmetric matrix from 28-element upper triangle."""
    P = np.zeros((_N_STATE, _N_STATE))
    k = 0
    for i in range(_N_STATE):
        for j in range(i, _N_STATE):
            P[i, j] = y_cov[k]
            P[j, i] = y_cov[k]
            k += 1
    return P

def rhs(t, y):
    vx, vy, vz = y[3], y[4], y[5]
    omega = y[6]
    P = _unpack_P(y[_N_STATE:])

    d = np.empty(_DIM_T1)

    # Target kinematics (coordinated turn)
    d[0] = vx
    d[1] = vy
    d[2] = vz
    d[3] = -omega * vy
    d[4] = omega * vx
    d[5] = 0.0
    d[6] = 0.0

    # Jacobian F = df/dy
    F = np.zeros((_N_STATE, _N_STATE))
    F[0, 3] = 1.0
    F[1, 4] = 1.0
    F[2, 5] = 1.0
    F[3, 4] = -omega
    F[3, 6] = -vy
    F[4, 3] = omega
    F[4, 6] = vx

    # Continuous Riccati: dP/dt = F P + P Fᵀ + Q
    dP = F @ P + P @ F.T + Q

    d[_N_STATE:] = _pack_P(dP)
    return d
Parameters
  • Q = [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, …] [shape=(7, 7), min=0, max=4]
  • _DIM_T1 = 35
  • _N_COV = 28
  • _N_STATE = 7
Initial condition
y(0) = [1000, 500, 100, 30, 10, -2, …] [shape=(35,), min=-2, max=10000]
Horizon
t ∈ [0, 60]

Canonical RHS excerpt captured from the same registered callable used for the published benchmark. Frozen closure values are summarized below; helper imports and solver settings are intentionally omitted.

Fingerprint

Spread: low

Default noise: none

Recommendation snapshot

Clean best: Tsit5

Noisy best: SolvSRK

Coverage

14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels

Ranked on survival, precision, and speed

Versions & freeze

Methodology →
Freeze
2026-08-13
libsolvsrk
2.3.0
SciPy
1.14
SUNDIALS
CVODE (bundled backend)

20 seeds/cell default · 14 arms · TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · this page: EKF Radar Tracker — Hover (ekf-radar-tracker-hover)

Governed SolvTune benchmark freeze; per-arm medians only. RHS definitions and raw trial rows are not published.

Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified

Results matrix

Pick an objective and a noise level to rank all arms on survival, median SCD, median nfev, and median wall time. Medians across seeds.

Objective

Best overall trade-off of survival, precision, and speed.

Noise level

#SolverSurvivalSCDnfevWallScore
1Tsit5external
100%
13.2288808 ms0.933
2SciPy RK45SciPy
100%
13.233210 ms0.933
3Vern9external
100%
13.21463.78 s0.933
4SolvSRK
100%
13.249917 ms0.933
5Vern7external
100%
13.2723.77 s0.933
6SciPy RadauSciPy
100%
13.21,80681 ms0.933
7SciPy DOP853SciPy
100%
13.2622 ms0.932
8SciPy LSODASciPy
100%
12.51314 ms0.916
9CVODE Adamsexternal
100%
11.9708 ms0.901
10SciPy BDFSciPy
100%
9.517810 ms0.845
11CVODE BDFexternal
100%
8.816111 ms0.827
12FBDFexternal
100%
8.62784.97 s0.824
13SciPy RK23SciPy
100%
7.73,335105 ms0.802
14TRBDF2external
100%
4.82,4755.24 s0.734

At Clean, best balanced arm is Tsit5 · SolvSRK survival 100%, SCD 13.2.

Values are medians across seeds, measured by Resonix Labs on Resonix hardware and not independently verified; nfev and wall are on reference lab hardware (indicative). Under injected noise only SolvSRK and the SciPy arms are run. How we measure accuracy → · Verification status →

SolvScout · free

Profile your problem for free

This page shows one published benchmark cell. SolvScout fingerprints your ODE, compares it to the full corpus, and recommends a solver with the same survival / precision / speed ranking you see here — including when a SciPy arm wins.

SolvSRK · 30-day trial

Run the winner on your machine

SolvSRK is the stiffness-adaptive integrator behind the SolvSRK column in these tables. Create an account, activate a machine, and take a 30-day trial — same binary you'd ship after purchase.

Cite this page

Replace the access date. Pin the freeze ID and library versions when comparing against a later export. Cite it as what it is — a self-reported vendor benchmark, not an independently verified result. The note field says so; please keep it.

@misc{resonix_evidence_ekf_radar_tracker_hover_2026,
  title        = {Resonix Evidence Portal: EKF Radar Tracker — Hover},
  author       = {{Resonix Labs (Canada) Inc.}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://resonix.tech/evidence/problems/ekf-radar-tracker-hover}},
  note         = {Self-reported vendor benchmark; internally generated by Resonix Labs and not independently verified. Accessed YYYY-MM-DD. Freeze 2026-08-13; libsolvsrk 2.3.0; SciPy 1.14.}
}

Related

TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · 398 problems · 14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels

Freeze: 2026-08-13 · scipy 1.14 · libsolvsrk 2.3.0 · Methodology

Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified · Verification status