Multi-Jammer Environment (Barrage + Deceptive)

ADVANTAGES2 · dim 20

SolvSRK wins. At the comparison noise level, SolvSRK beats the best baseline by at least 10 percentage points of survival, or by at least 0.05 balanced score when survival is tied. Use SolvSRK for this class of problem. All verdicts →

Simultaneous barrage + deceptive jamming. Target (6) + barrage jammer (3) + deceptive false track (5) + EKF covariance traces (4) + adaptive thresholds (2). Tests solver under compound EW threat environment.

Electronic warfare

Problem definition

Adamy, 'EW 101' (2001) Ch. 8 (combined EW environment)

Canonical RHS excerpt from the registered callable used for this benchmark cell. Expand it to verify the state equations; it is not a standalone runnable fixture.

Show canonical RHS excerpt
def _sigmoid(x: float | np.ndarray) -> float | np.ndarray:
    return 1.0 / (1.0 + np.exp(-np.clip(x, -500.0, 500.0)))

def rhs(t, y):
    d = np.empty(20)

    # --- target with mild evasion (coordinated turn) ---
    d[0] = y[3]
    d[1] = y[4]
    d[2] = y[5]
    d[3] = -omega_evade * y[4]
    d[4] = omega_evade * y[3]
    d[5] = 0.0

    # --- barrage jammer (3 states) ---
    J_power = y[6]
    J_duty = y[7]
    J_over_S = y[8]

    switch_val = _sigmoid(_K_SIG * np.sin(two_pi_over_T * t))

    d[6] = -J_power * inv_tau_j + J_max * switch_val
    d[7] = (switch_val - J_duty) * inv_tau_duty
    J_duty_safe = max(J_duty, 1e-10)
    d[8] = (J_power * J_duty_safe / S_signal - J_over_S) * inv_tau_js

    # --- deceptive false target (5 states: x, y, z, vx, vy) ---
    dec_x, dec_y, dec_z = y[9], y[10], y[11]
    dec_vx, dec_vy = y[12], y[13]

    d[9] = dec_vx
    d[10] = dec_vy
    d[11] = 0.0
    d[12] = -omega_false * dec_vy
    d[13] = omega_false * dec_vx

    # --- EKF covariance traces (4 states) ---
    for i in range(4):
        noise_contrib = noise_scale[i] * (1.0 + J_over_S * 0.1)
        d[14 + i] = -alpha_cov[i] * y[14 + i] + noise_contrib

    # --- adaptive thresholds (2 states) ---
    d[18] = (_sigmoid(_K_SIG * (J_over_S - JS_thresh)) - y[18]) * inv_tau_a1

    sep = np.sqrt(
        (dec_x - y[0]) ** 2
        + (dec_y - y[1]) ** 2
        + (dec_z - y[2]) ** 2
        + 1e-10
    )
    d[19] = (_sigmoid(_K_SIG * (sep / 100.0 - 0.5)) - y[19]) * inv_tau_a2

    return d
Parameters
  • JS_thresh = 10
  • J_max = 100
  • S_signal = 5
  • _K_SIG = 50
  • alpha_cov = [0.5, 0.5, 0.3, 0.3]
  • inv_tau_a1 = 1
  • inv_tau_a2 = 0.5
  • inv_tau_duty = 10
  • inv_tau_j = 2
  • inv_tau_js = 20
  • noise_scale = [2, 2, 1, 1]
  • omega_evade = 0.03
  • omega_false = 0.02
  • two_pi_over_T = 4.18879020479
Initial condition
y(0) = [5000, 2000, 1000, -200, 0, 0, …] [shape=(20,), min=-200, max=5100]
Horizon
t ∈ [0, 60]

Canonical RHS excerpt captured from the same registered callable used for the published benchmark. Frozen closure values are summarized below; helper imports and solver settings are intentionally omitted.

Fingerprint

Spread: low

Default noise: low

Recommendation snapshot

Clean best: SolvSRK

Noisy best: SolvSRK

Coverage

14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels

Ranked on survival, precision, and speed

Versions & freeze

Methodology →
Freeze
2026-08-13
libsolvsrk
2.3.0
SciPy
1.14
SUNDIALS
CVODE (bundled backend)

20 seeds/cell default · 14 arms · TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · this page: Multi-Jammer Environment (Barrage + Deceptive) (multi-jammer-environment-barrage-deceptive)

Governed SolvTune benchmark freeze; per-arm medians only. RHS definitions and raw trial rows are not published.

Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified

Results matrix

Pick an objective and a noise level to rank all arms on survival, median SCD, median nfev, and median wall time. Medians across seeds.

Objective

Best overall trade-off of survival, precision, and speed.

Noise level

#SolverSurvivalSCDnfevWallScore
1SolvSRK
100%
12.787,8741.75 s0.922
2SciPy RadauSciPy
100%
12.2112,1353.79 s0.909
3SciPy RK45SciPy
100%
11.234,718692 ms0.885
4Tsit5external
100%
10.933,1924.34 s0.879
5SciPy RK23SciPy
100%
10.6105,2662.30 s0.872
6SciPy DOP853SciPy
100%
10.426,318503 ms0.867
7CVODE Adamsexternal
100%
10.115,621324 ms0.860
8SciPy BDFSciPy
100%
10.041,9801.83 s0.858
9SciPy LSODASciPy
100%
9.926,407446 ms0.854
10CVODE BDFexternal
100%
9.621,507446 ms0.846

At Clean, best balanced arm is SolvSRK.

Values are medians across seeds, measured by Resonix Labs on Resonix hardware and not independently verified; nfev and wall are on reference lab hardware (indicative). Under injected noise only SolvSRK and the SciPy arms are run. How we measure accuracy → · Verification status →

SolvScout · free

Profile your problem for free

This page shows one published benchmark cell. SolvScout fingerprints your ODE, compares it to the full corpus, and recommends a solver with the same survival / precision / speed ranking you see here — including when a SciPy arm wins.

SolvSRK · 30-day trial

Run the winner on your machine

SolvSRK is the stiffness-adaptive integrator behind the SolvSRK column in these tables. Create an account, activate a machine, and take a 30-day trial — same binary you'd ship after purchase.

Cite this page

Replace the access date. Pin the freeze ID and library versions when comparing against a later export. Cite it as what it is — a self-reported vendor benchmark, not an independently verified result. The note field says so; please keep it.

@misc{resonix_evidence_multi_jammer_environment_barrage_deceptive_2026,
  title        = {Resonix Evidence Portal: Multi-Jammer Environment (Barrage + Deceptive)},
  author       = {{Resonix Labs (Canada) Inc.}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://resonix.tech/evidence/problems/multi-jammer-environment-barrage-deceptive}},
  note         = {Self-reported vendor benchmark; internally generated by Resonix Labs and not independently verified. Accessed YYYY-MM-DD. Freeze 2026-08-13; libsolvsrk 2.3.0; SciPy 1.14.}
}

Related

TRL 4–5 · simulation-lab validated · 398 problems · 14 solver arms · clean + 5 noise levels

Freeze: 2026-08-13 · scipy 1.14 · libsolvsrk 2.3.0 · Methodology

Self-reported by Resonix Labs · not independently verified · Verification status